Don’t do SECURITY. Do business SECURELY.

US Supreme Court narrows the TCPA’s autodialer definition in Facebook v. Duguid

The US Supreme Court has held that equipment must use a random or sequential number generator to be an autodialer under the TCPA.

The US Supreme Court has today decided Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, narrowing the definition of an “automatic telephone dialing system” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Key points

  • The Court unanimously held that a device must be able to store or produce numbers using a random or sequential number generator to qualify as an autodialer.
  • Systems that simply dial numbers from a stored list are not autodialers on that basis alone.
  • The ruling limits one of the main sources of TCPA class action litigation.
  • Rules on prerecorded and artificial-voice calls, Do-Not-Call lists and state “mini-TCPA” laws still apply.

UK organisations running calling or text campaigns to US numbers still face significant statutory damages, so consent records and Do-Not-Call compliance remain essential.

Source: Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid opinion (US Supreme Court)

Need help understanding what this change means for your organisation? Get in touch for a pragmatic, no-obligation conversation.

More insights